data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9692a/9692ae97a4f7a661bd0a5c1c73beef756ccd4a4e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/927ea/927eaa702fcbf65ea7add335a9a8334f96c68b0d" alt=""
“Semper Augustus” and “Viceroy” tulips
These were rare and very expensive tulips. For instance a single “Viceroy” (bottom right) tulip bulb would be priced between 3,000 – 4,000 guilders, at a time when a skilled craftsman would earn around 150 guilders a year. The “Semper Augustus” (see at right) was around 1,000 guilders in 1623 and went all the way to around 5,000 guilders by 1637 (see picture at right. Therefore, having a painting that included these and other flowers was a lot cheaper and less risky than having the real thing.Interestingly enough, the “flaming” was caused by a virus that “broke” the colors in the flower. Today similar tulips can be bought normally but the flaming effect is a courtesy of modern genetics.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31e20/31e203e06bec4989f6449a4e1ab6a1b7c455340a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49815/498156bbfde352c72833bc1272d073726c5ee1ef" alt=""
In the “Bosschaert” style photo seen at left, you can peruse and find a “Semper Augustus” alike tulip. I have used these profusely in my “Bosschaert” collection. You can browse the gallery here or by clicking the tab at the top of this page.
Feel free to connect with me in Facebook or Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment